Frequently Asked Questions

What is a SOC report?

A SOC (Service Organization Control) report is a document that verifies the quality and security of services provided by a service organization, like software as a service, data centers, IT managed services, and cloud computing. These reports are crucial for assessing the risks associated with outsourcing services and ensuring that the service provider meets or exceeds industry standards for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

There are different types of SOC reports:

  1. SOC 1: Focuses on controls at a service organization relevant to user entities’ internal control over financial reporting. This is typically requested by auditors.

  2. SOC 2: Addresses controls at a service organization relevant to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy. This report is broader and more relevant to compliance with regulations and standards.

  3. SOC 3: Similar to SOC 2 but designed for a general audience. It provides a summary of the service organization’s controls without the detailed and technical content found in a SOC 2 report.

Organizations seek SOC reports to gain assurance about the service provider’s controls, which can affect the organization’s own risk management and compliance with regulations. This document is not only a testament to the service organization's commitment to high standards but also serves as a key differentiator in the marketplace, providing an edge over competitors who do not have such validations.

Back to top.

What is the difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and Type 2?

The difference between SOC 2 Type 1 and SOC 2 Type 2 reports lies in the scope and depth of the audit performed on a service organization's controls related to the five trust service criteria: security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

  1. SOC 2 Type 1 Report focuses on the suitability of the design of controls at a specific point in time. It evaluates whether the systems and processes designed by an organization meet relevant trust principles as of a certain date. The report does not assess how effectively these controls operate over time, but rather if they are correctly designed to achieve the intended objectives.

  2. SOC 2 Type 2 Report, on the other hand, goes further by assessing the operational effectiveness of those controls over a defined period, typically at least six months. This type of report not only considers the design of controls but also their implementation and effectiveness in practice over time. It provides a more comprehensive view of the organization's security posture and compliance with the trust principles.

In summary, while SOC 2 Type 1 is about the design of controls at a single point in time, SOC 2 Type 2 extends the evaluation to how well those controls are implemented and maintained over a period, offering a deeper level of assurance to stakeholders.

Back to top.

Does my company need a SOC report?

Whether your company needs a SOC (Service Organization Control) report depends on several factors related to your business operations, client demands, and regulatory requirements. Here are key considerations to help determine if a SOC report is necessary for your company:

Client Requirements:

  • If your clients or potential clients request assurance about the effectiveness of your internal controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy, a SOC report can provide this assurance.

  • Companies that provide services to other businesses, especially when those services involve handling sensitive or financial data, are often asked for SOC reports during vendor assessment processes.

Competitive Advantage:

  • Having a SOC report can distinguish your company in a competitive market by demonstrating a commitment to maintaining high standards for control and data protection.

  • It reassures clients and business partners of your dedication to safeguarding their data, which can be a decisive factor in their choice of service providers.

Time and Cost Savings:

  • One significant benefit of obtaining a SOC report for your company is the potential to save considerable time and resources when responding to client security inquiries and questionnaires.

  • A SOC report provides a comprehensive and independently verified overview of your company’s controls and practices related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy. By presenting this report to clients, you can often pre-empt a wide range of individual queries, as the report covers the areas most client questionnaires will touch upon.

Standardization of Security Assurance:

  • Instead of responding to each client's unique security questionnaire, which can be time-consuming and resource-intensive, a SOC report allows you to offer a standardized document that addresses common concerns. This can significantly reduce the effort required to tailor responses to each client.

Enhanced Credibility and Trust:

  • A SOC report, especially a Type 2 report, demonstrates not just the design but also the effectiveness of your controls over time. This level of transparency and accountability can build trust with clients and prospects, potentially reducing the number of follow-up questions and the depth of scrutiny your company might otherwise face.

Efficiency in Sales and Vendor Management Processes:

  • Having a SOC report available can speed up the due diligence process during sales negotiations and vendor assessments. Clients who might otherwise require extensive documentation and checks can rely on the SOC report’s findings, allowing for quicker decision-making and reduced delays in the sales cycle.

Proactive Issue Identification:

  • The process of obtaining a SOC report can help your company identify and address potential security and compliance issues before they become problematic. By resolving these issues in advance, you reduce the likelihood of client inquiries or concerns related to these areas.

Long-Term Relationship Building:

  • Providing a SOC report as part of your standard response to security inquiries can help establish your company as a proactive and security-conscious partner. Over time, this can lead to stronger client relationships, as clients appreciate the thoroughness and professionalism this approach demonstrates.

In summary, a SOC report is not just a tool for compliance and internal improvement; it's also a strategic asset that can save your company time and effort in client communications. By preemptively addressing many common security concerns, a SOC report allows you to streamline client interactions and focus more resources on your core business activities.

Back to top.

How does my company get a SOC report?

1. Determine the Type of SOC Report You Need

  • SOC 1: Focuses on controls relevant to financial reporting.

  • SOC 2: Examines controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy.

  • SOC 3: Similar to SOC 2 but for general release with less detail.

2. Choose Between Type 1 or Type 2 Reports

  • Type 1: Assesses the design of controls at a specific point in time.

  • Type 2: Evaluates the operational effectiveness of those controls over a period, usually 6 to 12 months.

3. Conduct a Readiness Assessment

  • Perform an internal review or hire a consultant to identify any gaps in your current control environment compared to SOC requirements.

  • Address identified gaps through policy updates, process changes, or new control implementations.

4. Select an Independent Auditor

  • Choose a CPA firm or a service auditor experienced in performing SOC examinations. Ensure they have a good reputation and understand your industry.

5. Prepare for the Audit

  • Gather documentation on your controls, processes, and systems as evidence for the auditor.

  • Implement any necessary changes or improvements identified during the readiness assessment.

6. Undergo the SOC Audit

  • Work with the auditor as they review your controls, test control effectiveness (for Type 2), and evaluate compliance with the relevant trust service principles.

7. Address Audit Findings

  • Review the auditor’s draft report and address any findings or deficiencies noted.

8. Receive Your SOC Report

  • After the audit is complete and any issues are resolved, you will receive your SOC report, detailing the scope of the audit, the auditor's findings, and, in the case of a Type 2 report, the effectiveness of the controls over the review period.

9. Continuous Improvement

  • Use the insights from the SOC report to continuously improve your controls and processes. Regularly update your policies and training programs to maintain compliance and prepare for subsequent SOC reports.

Additional Tips

  • Start with a Type 1 report if this is your first SOC audit to establish a baseline before moving on to a Type 2 report.

  • Regular communication with the auditor throughout the process can help clarify expectations and ensure a smoother audit process.

Obtaining a SOC report demonstrates to your clients and partners your commitment to maintaining a high level of security and operational integrity.

Contact us now if you’d like help!

Back to top.

Who conducts a SOC report?

A SOC (Service Organization Control) report is conducted by an independent CPA (Certified Public Accountant) or a CPA firm that specializes in conducting such audits. These auditors must adhere to specific professional standards set by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) when performing SOC examinations.

The process involves a thorough examination of the service organization's controls related to:

  • financial reporting

  • security

  • availability

  • processing integrity

  • confidentiality

  • privacy

The focus depends on the type of SOC report being prepared (SOC 1, SOC 2, or SOC 3). The auditor assesses whether the controls are designed appropriately implemented effectively, and operating as intended over a specified period.

After completing the examination, the auditor issues the SOC report, which includes the auditor’s opinion on the effectiveness of the controls at the service organization. This independent and objective assessment is crucial for service organizations to build trust with their clients and stakeholders, ensuring that they are managing risks appropriately and protecting sensitive information as promised.

Back to top.

What is included in a SOC report?

What is included in a SOC report?A Service Organization Control (SOC) report provides a thorough review of a service organization's internal controls. The exact content can vary depending on the type of SOC report (SOC 1, SOC 2, or SOC 3) and whether it's a Type 1 or Type 2 report. However, most SOC reports include the following key components:

Section 1: Auditor’s Report

This section contains the independent auditor's opinion on the service organization's system controls. Key elements include:

  • The purpose of the audit and the scope of the examination, including the period covered.

  • The auditor’s opinion on the fairness of the presentation of the management’s description of the system, the suitability of the design of the controls, and, in Type 2 reports, the operating effectiveness of those controls.

  • A description of the testing methodology used to evaluate the controls and the results of those tests.

Section 2: Management Assertion

In this section, management provides assertions regarding:

  • The completeness and accuracy of the system description.

  • The suitability of the design of the controls to achieve the stated control objectives at a specific point in time for Type 1 reports, or over the specified period for Type 2 reports.

  • For Type 2 reports, the operational effectiveness of the controls throughout the specified period.

Section 3: System Description

This narrative description of the service organization’s system includes:

  • The types of services provided.

  • The components of the system including infrastructure, software, people, and processes.

  • The controls that have been implemented to achieve the control objectives.

  • Any relevant aspects of the control environment, risk management processes, and information and communication systems.

Section 4: Description of Criteria

This section outlines:

  • The criteria used to evaluate the controls, typically based on trust service principles (security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy).

  • How these criteria relate to the control objectives and the design and, for Type 2 reports, the operating effectiveness of the controls.

Section 5: Other Information (optional)

This optional section may include:

  • Additional details that the service organization or auditor deems relevant to understanding the system’s controls, the audit process, or the findings.

  • It can include explanations of complex processes, additional evidence supporting the auditor’s findings, or further context about the service organization’s control environment.

Each of these sections plays a crucial role in providing a comprehensive overview of the service organization's control environment, offering valuable insights to stakeholders about the organization’s commitment to maintaining high standards of internal control.

Back to top.

How often should organizations undergo a SOC audit?

Organizations typically undergo a SOC audit annually. This frequency aligns with the common reporting period for many compliance requirements and ensures that stakeholders have up-to-date information on the organization's control environment. Regular annual audits allow organizations to demonstrate ongoing compliance with the relevant trust service principles and address any changes in their systems or processes. For businesses experiencing significant changes or facing new regulatory demands, more frequent reviews might be necessary to ensure continued compliance and security assurance to clients and partners.

Back to top.

What is the difference between a SOC 1 and SOC 2?

The primary difference between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports lies in their focus and the framework used for assessment:

SOC 1:

  • Focus: SOC 1 reports are centered on the controls at a service organization relevant to the internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) of the user entities. Essentially, SOC 1 is designed for entities that handle financial transactions and information that could impact the financial statements of their clients.

  • Framework: The assessment is based on the Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 18, specifically focusing on the service organization's controls that may affect clients' financial reporting.

  • Users: Primarily intended for the user entities’ management, auditors, and financial statement stakeholders.

SOC 2:

  • Focus: SOC 2 reports are focused on controls relevant to the security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy of a service organization’s systems and the information processed by these systems. SOC 2 is broader in scope, concerning the operations and compliance relevant to specific trust service criteria, making it applicable to a wide range of industries.

  • Framework: The assessment follows the AICPA’s Trust Services Criteria. It evaluates the effectiveness of the controls in place to ensure the secure, private, and reliable operation of the service organization’s systems.

  • Users: Intended for stakeholders such as management, customers, regulators, and business partners concerned with the security and compliance of the service organization, not limited to financial reporting.

In summary, the choice between SOC 1 and SOC 2 reporting depends on the nature of the service provided by the organization and the needs of its clients or partners. SOC 1 is more relevant for entities directly involved with financial processes affecting client financial statements, whereas SOC 2 applies to a broader range of services where data security and operational integrity are of concern.

Back to top.

What is a SOC 3 report?

A SOC 3 (Service Organization Control 3) report is designed for a broader audience than SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports. It provides a high-level overview of an organization's controls related to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, or privacy, but without the detailed and technical disclosures found in SOC 2 reports. The SOC 3 report is based on the same Trust Services Criteria as SOC 2 but is intended for general public use, making it suitable for sharing on a company's website or with potential clients who require assurance of the company’s controls without needing the detailed information contained in SOC 2 reports.

Key aspects of a SOC 3 report include:

  • An Auditor’s Opinion: This section provides the auditor’s opinion on whether the organization’s controls are effective in achieving the stated trust service principles.

  • Management’s Assertion: Similar to SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports, management asserts that the system is appropriately designed and operating effectively.

  • System Description: A brief description of the system that was reviewed, including the services covered by the report.

  • Trust Services Criteria: The report outlines the applicable Trust Services Criteria - security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.

  • Seal of Assurance: Organizations that receive a SOC 3 report can display a "SOC 3 Seal" on their website, indicating that they have undergone a SOC audit and met the required standards of controls.

The SOC 3 report is useful for organizations that wish to communicate their commitment to maintaining a strong control environment over their information systems but do not need to provide the detailed and technical information found in SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports.

Back to top.

What is Governance, Risk, and Compliance?

Governance, Risk, and Compliance (GRC) is an integrated framework that helps organizations ensure they act ethically, comply with regulations and laws, and perform risk management processes effectively. Here’s a breakdown of each component:

Governance

Refers to the set of policies, procedures, and practices used by an organization to ensure accountability, fairness, and transparency in its relationship with all its stakeholders (including shareholders, customers, and the community). Governance involves guiding, directing, and controlling an organization to achieve its goals, manage its resources responsibly, and ensure its long-term sustainability and integrity.

Risk

Involves identifying, assessing, and managing threats to an organization's capital and earnings. These risks can come from various sources such as financial uncertainty, legal liabilities, management errors, accidents, and natural disasters. Effective risk management ensures an organization understands and controls the risks it faces, balancing the pursuit of opportunities with the appropriate level of risk.

Compliance

Refers to the process of making sure an organization and its employees follow the laws, regulations, standards, and ethical practices that apply to the organization. Compliance helps prevent fraud, breaches of privacy, and other legal and regulatory violations that could lead to fines, penalties, and damage to the organization's reputation.

Integrating Governance, Risk, and Compliance into a unified framework allows organizations to align their strategies, processes, technology, and people, thereby improving efficiency and effectiveness. This approach helps organizations manage their risks better, operate within legal and ethical boundaries, and ensure that decision-making processes are effective and align with the organization's objectives.

Back to top.

What are SOX controls?

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act stipulates that financial reports must incorporate an Internal Controls Report, verifying the precision of financial data (to a variance of no more than 5%) and affirming the implementation of robust controls to protect financial information. Furthermore, it mandates the submission of year-end financial disclosure reports. These requirements are enforced through an audit by an independent, external auditor under Section 404, focusing on a comprehensive review of controls, policies, and procedures.

This audit extends to evaluating personnel, involving staff interviews to ensure their roles accurately reflect their job descriptions and that they possess the appropriate training for secure financial information handling.

SOX sections 302, 404, and 409 specifically demand the monitoring, logging, and auditing of:

  • The framework of internal controls

  • Activities related to network, database, and logins (highlighting both successful and failed attempts)

  • Actions pertaining to account and user engagements

  • Information access protocols

For SOX compliance, auditing procedures require that internal controls and related processes be verifiable through established control frameworks like COBIT. Systems for log collection and monitoring must also facilitate a detailed audit trail for all interactions with sensitive business information.

In the context of SOX compliance audits, a significant emphasis is placed on the evaluation of a company’s internal controls. This encompasses all IT assets involved in the processing of financial data, including but not limited to computers, networking hardware, and electronic devices. Key areas scrutinized in a SOX IT audit include:

  • IT Security: Ensuring the existence of effective measures to prevent data breaches and the capability to remediate any incidents swiftly. Investments in technologies and services that monitor and protect the financial database are crucial.

  • Access Control: These are essential for barring unauthorized access to sensitive financial data, involving secure storage for servers and data centers, implementing robust password policies, and other security strategies.

  • Data Backup: It's imperative to have reliable systems in place for backing up critical data. Facilities that store backup data, regardless of their location or whether they are managed in-house or by external parties, must comply with SOX regulations just as primary data centers do.

  • Change Management: This refers to the IT department's protocols for onboarding new users and systems, updating software, and modifying databases or other data infrastructure components. Detailed records of these changes, including what was altered, when, and by whom, are essential for compliance.

Back to top.

What is GDPR and why does it apply to North American companies?

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) is a comprehensive data protection law that came into effect in the European Union (EU) on May 25, 2018. It's designed to give individuals in the EU more control over their personal data while simplifying the regulatory environment for international business by unifying the regulation within the EU. The GDPR sets out principles for data management and the rights of individuals, imposing strict rules on data processing and movement beyond EU borders.

Why GDPR Applies to North American Companies:

1.     Extraterritorial Reach:

    • The GDPR is not limited to companies based in the EU; it has a broad territorial scope. It applies to any organization, regardless of location, that processes personal data of individuals in the EU. This means North American companies that offer goods or services to individuals in the EU, or monitor their behavior within the EU, must comply with the GDPR.

2.     Data Processing Activities:

    • If a North American company collects, stores, or processes personal data of individuals in the EU, it is subject to GDPR regulations. This can include activities such as using cookies on a website to track user behavior, processing orders from EU customers, or handling employee information for staff working in the EU.

3.     Global Market and Online Services:

    • The digital nature of today’s economy means many businesses operate internationally, even if they don't have a physical presence in the EU. Online services, e-commerce sites, and cloud-based operations often handle data from EU citizens, thereby necessitating compliance with GDPR.

4.     Legal and Financial Implications:

    • Non-compliance with the GDPR can result in significant fines, up to €20 million or 4% of the company’s global annual turnover, whichever is higher. Beyond financial penalties, failure to comply can also damage a company’s reputation and customer trust.

5.     Data Protection by Design:

    • The GDPR encourages organizations to implement data protection measures from the onset of designing their systems, rather than as an addition. This means North American companies need to consider data privacy in all stages of their product or service development if it involves EU data subjects.

For North American companies, adhering to GDPR is not just about legal compliance; it’s also a matter of reputational importance and ethical responsibility towards data privacy. Compliance can enhance customer trust and demonstrate a commitment to protecting individual privacy rights on a global scale.

Back to top.

Why should my company use a password manager?

Using a password manager offers several benefits that can enhance your company's security posture, streamline access management, and improve overall operational efficiency. Here are key reasons why your company should consider using a password manager:

1. Enhanced Security:

  • Strong, Unique Passwords: Password managers can generate strong, unique passwords for every account, reducing the risk of breaches resulting from weak or reused passwords.

  • Encrypted Storage: Passwords are stored in an encrypted vault, protecting them from unauthorized access, even if a device is compromised.

  • Secure Sharing: Safely share passwords within your team without exposing them in plain text, ensuring sensitive information remains protected.

2. Improved Compliance:

  • Regulatory Compliance: Many industries are subject to regulations that mandate stringent data security practices, including the management of access credentials. A password manager helps in meeting these compliance requirements.

  • Audit Trails: Some password managers provide logs of who accessed what information and when, supporting audit requirements and enhancing accountability.

3. Increased Efficiency and Productivity:

  • Quick Access: Employees can quickly access the accounts they need without remembering complex passwords, reducing downtime and frustration.

  • Reduced Reset Requests: Fewer password reset requests to IT support, freeing up valuable resources and reducing support costs.

  • Streamlined Onboarding: New employees can be granted access to necessary tools and accounts swiftly, ensuring a smooth onboarding process.

4. Mitigate the Impact of Data Breaches:

  • Fast Response: In the event of a breach, you can quickly change passwords for affected accounts, potentially limiting damage.

  • Password Health Checks: Regularly review the strength and reuse of passwords across your organization, identifying and rectifying potential vulnerabilities.

5. Cross-Platform Accessibility:

  • Sync Across Devices: Employees can access their passwords securely from any device, ensuring they can work efficiently whether in the office, at home, or on the move.

  • Browser and App Integration: Seamlessly integrate with web browsers and applications for autofill options, streamlining the login process while maintaining security.

6. Enhanced User Education and Behavior:

  • Promote Good Security Practices: Encouraging the use of a password manager can foster a security-conscious culture within your company.

  • Reduce Risky Behavior: Lessens the likelihood of employees resorting to unsafe password practices, such as using simple passwords or storing them in insecure locations.

In today's digital landscape, where data breaches are increasingly common and the costs of such incidents are high, investing in a password manager is a proactive step towards safeguarding your company's digital assets. It not only protects sensitive information but also supports operational efficiency and regulatory compliance.

Back to top.